云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

村落资源资本化是民族传统村落保护与发展的可适性路径。但在产业发展中，外来经营企业成为资源资本化的最大获益者，而村民这一应然受益主体被边缘化，出现主客易位问题。对R村的调研发现，外来经营企业对话语权的争夺使其逐渐成为资源资本化的“发言人”,村民虽拥有参与权利，却因缺乏参与能力，在资源资本化发展中处于弱势位置，最终导致外来经营企业的主位取代与村民的主位丧失。民族传统村落的资源资本化，要遵循村民本位的主位发展逻辑，应从以往“主位-客位”二元对立的主体性博弈向有着共同价值判断的“主体间性”共同体发展转变，实现传统村落资源转化的主体重建和价值共创，从而为传统村落保护与发展、传统文化传承与创新、民族“三交”、乡村振兴和各民族共同富裕提供地方实践经验。

The capitalization of village resources is an adaptable path for the protection and development of traditional ethnic villages. However, in the development of industries, the enterprise operated by the non-native has become the biggest beneficiary of the capitalization of resources, while the villagers, as the rightful beneficiaries, have been marginalized, resulting in the problem of host-guest translocation. The research on R village has found that the competition for discourse power by the enterprise operated by the non-native has gradually made such enterprise the “spokesperson” for resource capitalization. Although the villagers have the right to participate, they are in a disadvantaged position in the development of resource capitalization due to a lack of capacity to participate, ultimately leading to the replacement of their dominant position by the enterprise operated by the non-native, which mirrors the loss of the dominant position of the villagers. The capitalization of resources in traditional ethnic villages should follow a villager-centered logic in development, and should shift from the game of the previous binary opposition of “host-guest” subjectivity to the development of an “intersubjectivity-oriented” community with common value judgments. This will achieve the subjective reconstruction and value co-creation of the transformation of traditional village resources, and provide the practical local experience for the protection and development of traditional villages, the inheritance and innovation of traditional cultures, the interethnic communication, exchange and fusion as well as the rural revitalization and the shared prosperity of all the ethnic groups.