| 532 | 1 | 68 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
面对当今纷繁复杂的国际社会，以信息传播和态度影响为中心的传统公共外交路径已难以达成深层共识，公共外交研究逐渐转向关系视角，关注关系结构与互动过程。在关系导向视阈下，将非物质文化遗产(以下简称非遗)视为承载跨国社会互动的关系媒介，是基于非遗在历史交往实践中体现关系联结价值，在当代复杂外交环境中发挥关系缓冲价值，并在面向未来可持续发展进程中彰显关系调适价值。从结构层面看，非遗以嵌入社群的活态实践特征构成关系生成的社会基础，以持续传承机制奠定关系累积的时间结构，以开放生成特征维持跨文化协商的意义空间。在实践层面，非遗公共外交体现为“呈现—对话—协作”三种互动形态：通过可识别的文化表达启动关系，在在场参与和持续互动中深化关系，在长期合作与共同项目中稳固关系。当围绕非遗的跨国交往呈现为可参与、可持续的共同实践形态时，差异可以在互动与协商中被转化为“可共处、可互鉴的差异”,非遗亦由此在关系生成中发挥更强的联结与调适作用。这一思路与人类命运共同体所强调的共生合作具有内在一致性。
Abstract：In an increasingly complex international environment, traditional public diplomacy approaches centered on information dissemination and attitude influence have become insufficient for reaching cross-cultural consensus. As a result, scholars have increasingly turned toward a relational perspective that emphasizes ongoing interaction and the formation of lasting connections. Within this context, this article conceptualizes Intangible Cultural Heritage(ICH) as a relational medium embedded in transnational social life. Historically, ICH has facilitated cross-cultural linkages through shared practices and reciprocal exchange. In contemporary diplomatic settings marked by political tensions, it can help preserve channels of social interaction and mitigate relational strain. Looking ahead, its emphasis on continuity, community participation, and ecological adaptation offers resources for long-term relational adjustment in the context of sustainable development. As living practice, ICH is rooted in community networks, sustained through intergenerational transmission, and open to reinterpretation in new cultural contexts—features that together enable it to support the gradual formation and consolidation of cross-cultural relationships.In practice, ICH-based public diplomacy unfolds through presentation, dialogue, and collaboration. Cultural presentation launches relationships by initiating contact; embodied interaction deepens relationships through mutual understanding; and sustained cooperation, including joint projects, consolidates relationships by stabilizing relational ties. When transnational interactions organized around ICH take the form of participatory and sustainable shared practice, differences can be transformed through interaction and negotiation into differences that can be lived with and can foster mutual learning; in this way, ICH plays a stronger connective and adaptive role in relationship formation. This perspective resonates with the cooperative ethos underlying the vision of a community with a shared future for mankind.
① 中华人民共和国中央人民政府：《习近平对非物质文化遗产保护工作作出重要指示》,(2022-12-12)[2026-02-01].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-12/12/content_5731508.htm.
(1)Leonard,M.,Stead,C.,Smewing,C.:Public Diplomacy,London:Foreign Policy Centre,2002,p.48.
(2)Melissen,J.:The New Public Diplomacy:Between Theory and Practice,in The New Public Diplomacy:Soft Power in International Relations,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2005,pp.12-13.
(3)Kashima,E.S.,and Hardie,E.A.:The Development and Validation of the Relational,Individual,and Collective Self-Aspects (RIC) Scale,Asian Journal of Social Psychology,3,2000.
(4)Emirbayer,M.:Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.American Journal of Sociology,103(2),1997.
(5)Ho,David Y.F.:Interpersonal Relationships and Relationship Dominance:An Analysis Based on Methodological Relationalism,Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1(1),1998.
(6)秦亚青,付清:《关系转向与关系主义世界政治理论——基于中西学理对话和比较视角的分析》,载《国际观察》2023年第6期。
(7)Melissen,J.:The New Public Diplomacy:Between Theory and Practice,in The New Public Diplomacy:Soft Power in International Relations,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2005,p.21.
(8)Fitzpatrick,K.R.:Advancing the New Public Diplomacy:A Public Relations Perspective,The Hague Journal of Diplomacy,2(3),2007.
(9)Cowan,G.,Arsenault,A.:Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration:The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616(1),2008.
(10)Zaharna,R.S.,Arsenault,A.,& Fisher,A.(eds.):Relational,Networked,and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy:The Connective Mindshift,London:Routledge,2013,pp.14-15.
(11)Yun,S.H.:Relational Public Diplomacy:The Perspective of Sociological Globalism,International Journal of Communication,6,2012.
(12)Zaharna,R.S.:Culture,Cultural Diversity and Humanity-Centred Diplomacies,The Hague Journal of Diplomacy,14(1-2),2019.
(13)Zaharna,R.S.:Culture,Cultural Diversity and Humanity-Centred Diplomacies,The Hague Journal of Diplomacy,14(1-2),2019.
(14)Schneider,C.P.:Culture Communicates:US Diplomacy that Works,in The New Public Diplomacy:Soft Power in International Relations,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2005,pp.157–158.
(15)Winter,T.:Heritage Diplomacy,International Journal of Heritage Studies,21(10),2015.
(16)Lähdesmäki,Tuuli,and Ĉeginskas Vaiva:Conceptualisation of Heritage Diplomacy in Scholarship,International Journal of Heritage Studies,28(10),2022.
(17)联合国教科文组织:《保护非物质文化遗产公约》,(2003-10-17)[2026-02-01].https://www.un.org/zh/documents/treaty/ich.
(18)联合国教科文组织:《保护非物质文化遗产公约》,(2003-10-17)[2026-02-01].https://www.un.org/zh/documents/treaty/ich.
(19)UNESCO:Intangible Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development,(2015-11-05)[2026-02-01].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243402.
(20)UNESCO:Intangible Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development,(2015-11-05)[2026-02-01].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243402.
(21)Zaharna,R.S.:Battles to Bridges:U.S.Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2010,p.147.
(22)联合国教科文组织:《保护非物质文化遗产公约》,(2003-10-17)[2026-02-01].https://www.un.org/zh/documents/treaty/ich.
(23)Cull,N.J.:Public Diplomacy:Taxonomies and Histories,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616,2008.
(24)Zaharna,R.S.:Battles to Bridges:U.S.Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2010,pp.149-150.
(25)联合国教科文组织:《保护非物质文化遗产公约》,(2003-10-17)[2026-02-01].https://www.un.org/zh/documents/treaty/ich.
(26)Welsch W.:Transculturality:The Puzzling Form of Cultures Today.Spaces of Culture:City,Nation,World,London:Sage,1999,p.198.
(27)史安斌:《从“跨文化传播”到“转文化传播”》,载《国际传播》2018年第5期。
(28)Cowan,G.,Arsenault,A.:Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration:The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616(1),2008.
(29)Cull,N.J.:Public Diplomacy:Taxonomies and Histories,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616,2008.
(30)Cowan,G.,Arsenault,A.:Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration:The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616(1),2008.
(31)Zaharna,R.S.:Battles to Bridges:U.S.Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2010,pp.118-122.
(32)Cowan,G.,Arsenault,A.:Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration:The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,616(1),2008.
(33)樊明君:《从〈火焰山〉到〈镜花缘〉 四川省川剧院海外飘红》,载《中国文化报》2010年8月12日第6版。
基本信息:
DOI：10.13727/j.cnki.53-1191/c.20260309.001
中图分类号:D820;G125
引用信息:
[1]钟新,林芊语.关系导向视域下非物质文化遗产公共外交：价值、逻辑与模式[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,43(02):52-60.DOI:10.13727/j.cnki.53-1191/c.20260309.001.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“新时代加快国际传播五力建设研究”(22AZD074)阶段成果
2026-03-09
2026-03-09
2026-03-09